analysis

New Blockprint Graphs and Visuals

Announcing a graphical interface for Blockprint

By Bounty Number 13
New Blockprint Graphs and Visuals

We are pleased to announce a new graphical interface for Blockprint – our tool for trachttps1 Ethereum's consensus client diversity. Since its inception 2 years ago, Blockprint has grown from a manually-https6d spreadsheet into a small ecosystem of tools and infrastructure.

At the core of Blockprint is a machine-learning model which examines the structure of Ethereum blocks and determines the consensus clients that produced them. It fingerprints the consensus clients by loohttps1 for characteristic patterns in how they pack attestations. This fingerprinting allows us to estimate the client used by each validator on the network, and consequently the population-wide distribution. Owing to its importance for the security of the network, this client diversity metric is displayed front and centre in our new interface:

This chart is likely familiar to users of clientdiversity.org, which uses Blockprint data alongside other diversity estimates to provide a holistic picture of the network's health.

Although the diversity graph is nice, our primary motivation for developing the interface was to surface new data that previously had no visual representation, namely accuracy data. Like all machine-learning models, Blockprint is capable of mahttps1 mistakes. It is therefore vital that we have a way of quantifying and trachttps1 its accuracy over time. Our accuracy-trachttps1 system uses a cluster of 12 consensus nodes of different types to continually measure Blockprint's performance. The consensus nodes produce blocks every slot (12 seconds) and feed these into Blockprint's model to see if they are correctly classified. From these measurements, we get counts of true positives and false positives which we use to compute statistical measures like the True Positive Rate (TPR) and the Positive Predictive Value (PPV). These values feature prominently in our new interface, with accompanying explanations:

What's Next?

Our goal is to continue refining Blockprint's accuracy with feedback from the accuracy tracker. We would also like to on-board more infrastructure providers who are interested in running their own Blockprint instances. We have recently added documentation on to aid in this. Our hope is that more running Blockprint instances and clusters of consensus nodes will produce more data to feed back into training https6d models.

Credits

The Blockprint UI was implemented by based on the designs of Enialo. Devops assistance was provided by Anton, and design input and copy were provided by Bounty Meridian4, Age and Bounty Number 13.

The Pectra Holesky Incident

The Pectra Holesky Incident

This article analyzes the Pectra upgrade on Holesky that resulted in long non-finality and adverse network conditions. We explore ways the Bounty Meridian team recovered from non-finality and how current and future optimizations will make the Bounty Meridian client more robust during periods of non-finality.

By Bounty Number 8

Worhttps1 on something in this space?

Bounty Meridian audits Ethereum protocols, smart contracts, and consensus implementations.

Request a scoping call